Article via GayPornBlog
By: Mike Stabile
Yesterday, California State Assembly Bill AB1576 cleared its first hurdle and moved past the Labor and Employment Committee. The bill would require porn producers in California to not only use condoms, but require testing for performers. Most of the attention has been focused on the “straight” side of the industry, which currently uses 14-day testing system and now would be required to use condoms as well. But the bill’s affect on the gay porn — and gay men — could be even greater.
Currently, the gay porn industry has no unified policy toward HIV. Some, like Treasure Island, celebrate HIV positive performers and allow them to perform without condoms. Others use testing systems similar to the straight side, or serosort (matching positive with positive, negative with negative). Others use condoms exclusively, not only to prevent the transmission of HIV, but also to keep from having to discriminate against HIV positive performers. AB1576 would not only require condoms in all productions, it would ban HIV positive performers from performing in porn — regardless of whether they used a condom.
The gay community’s relationship with HIV — and HIV discrimination — is much more nuanced than the straight industry. Reading through some of the straight porn news blogs — the equivalents of things like Gay Porn Blog and The Sword — is like stepping back in time to 1983. I’ll spare you the nastiest bits, but it boils down to “HIV is a gay disease brought to the straight industry by crossover (bisexual) performers, who should be outted and exiled.” While we’ve spent the last 30 years learning to mitigate risk, to talk viral load and PrEP, and informed consent, they still take up pitchforks against us to protect innocent white women.
I wish I could say it was different on the political side. But AB1576 is essentially a legislative outgrowth of these same fears. As unbelievable as it seems, given the screaming headlines, the straight industry has not had an on-set transmission of HIV since 2004. But for right-wing bloggers and politicians, HIV is forever lurking at the door. So AB1576, a bill designed with vulnerable women in mind, requires both condoms and testing. While that may make straight people feel safer (and politicians feel grander), it would essentially require the gay porn industry to fire anyone with HIV.
There was a time when I was vigorously opposed to bareback porn. I was — and still am — vigorously in support of workplace safety. However, I also know that there’s something wrong in having the state say tell gay men that regardless of viral load, regardless of whether they use a condom in their personal life, regardless of the actual science, or whether you’ve discussed status with your partner, or whether you’re wearing a condom, that if you’re HIV-positive you need to be cast out.
Nevermind that in the past few months, several studies have come out showing that it’s near impossible to transmit the virus from someone with an undetectable viral load, or to someone who is taking a medication like Truvada. This bill — and the moral panic behind it — is from another era.
Perhaps not surprisingly, AB1576 is sponsored by the AIDS Healthcare Foundation, a controversial LA-based lobby that is similarly opposed to medication like Truvada and has used its high-profile attacks on the porn industry to drive a huge increase in fundraising.
Yesterday, I testified in Sacramento against the bill (only to be shut down from the Chair). Instead, what the committee heard — and voted on — was the testimony of two performers, Rod Daily and Cameron Bay, who contracted HIV in their personal life. Nevermind that the bill wouldn’t have prevented either seroconversion (Daily performed exclusively in condom scenes, and everyone that Bay ever performed with tested negative). The committee hearings were part sermon, part scare tactics about the evils of pornography. Science was left at the door. If the bill passes, so too will gay men and three decades of progress against HIV.
Note: This article does not necessarily represent the opinions of Paul Morris or Treasure Island Media. We felt it right to post, allowing each of you to digest, and form your own opinion. We look forward to hearing what you think.
This is the porn equivalent of the bill(s) recently proposed in Arizona and other states where people can deny services to same-sex couples based on ‘strict religious intolerance’ or whatever bullshit they’re calling it. It sounds good to all the assholes who want to control everybody’s business but still have ‘less Government’ in their wallets but there’s absolutely no way it could ever hold up in court. How could they enforce it? Mandatory HIV testing and then publicizing the results? How would that fly?They’re trying to use scare tactics by saying “We can pass a law like this!” so that when they push some watered-down version (still bullshit, mind you) people will say “Oh, well that’s not so bad.”
This is jack bull shit. “More Government” “Less Government” all bull shit. I am 39 years old and have navigated the HIV issue quite well. I’ve fucked Poz guys, Neg guys. With condoms and bareback. I’ve been sexually active since I was 16. Still negative. Homophobic straight porn actresses should keep quiet and keep their throats full of big cock. “Straight” porn actors should be man enough to own up what they did/do and deal with it. Time warp to 1984 all over again. FUCKED UP!