HIV+ Guys Have Sex…and they Enjoy it…What the Deuce?

By Chris Ashford, Law And Sexuality

It’s been a while since I blogged about the ever controversial US bareback porn studio, Treasure Island Media (TIM).  Their latest release -Drunk on Cum 6 – focuses on oral sex, and the consumption of semen.  However, as a bareback studio, they come under (what I find to be) surprising amounts of criticism for these oral scenes. 

The Sword blog posted a little blog piece (NSFW – explicit sexual imagery) with a typically bitchy (and funny) little post, introducing the embedded trailer with: ‘Don’t worry, you needn’t have seen Drunk On Cum 1, Drunk On Cum 2, Drunk On Cum 3, Drunk On Cum 4, or even Drunk On Cum 5 to understand the plot.’
The film features extensive scenes of oral sex and semen drinking (or ‘cum guzzling’ to use the parlance), including (going off the trailer) one scene of someone swallowing the semen contents of a glass jar and also semen being drunk from a condom.The film is familiar ground for the studio, and the title -so studio honcho Paul Morris once told me – are a tribute to the d.o.c (drunk on cum) lust letters between Paul Beckford and Kevin Dax.  Here’s the Amazon blurb for that text:

‘The first book of its kind to combine true erotic stories with an intimate look into the developing experiences and relationship of one adventurous gay couple. Documenting the real-life e-mail romance of Kevin and Paul, D.O.C. Lust Letters is a shockingly explicit and movingly honest glimpse into the sexual and emotional lives of two gay men. Readers can follow the writers as they cruise the wild California gay scene of the late 1990s – from San Francisco to Los Angeles and everywhere in between – and journey deep inside gay erotic haunts, from underground sex clubs and bathhouses to parks and highway rest stops. Candidly exploring the writers’ passion for multiple partners, a memorably diverse cast of characters – from bi pierced punks to buff go-go boys to shy married men – populates this unapologetic paean to a world weary of safe sex.’

It is a rather wonderful book and TIM did for a time sell the book themselves, but don’t seem to anymore.  You can however still buy it through various booklets such as Amazon .  It does contextualise the use of the film title – and the appropriateness of still using it.

Anyway, on to my main point.  When I read the post on The Sword, it wasn’t the blog that surprised me, but rather the comments of readers.  I’m used to blogs and reports objecting to the bareback sex for which TIM is so well known, and I’ve written on that before.  What astonished me was the reaction to guys engaging in oral sex, and arguably, ‘safer’ sex.

CLICK HERE TO READ THOSE COMMENTS

OK, so it’s only a relatively small number of individuals (although a high percentage of those commenting on this story),  but it reveals a fascinating – and worrying – attitude which rejects the TIM men not for what they are doing, but for what they represent.

The men are positioned as HIV+ (some of the studio performers are, some are not – as with other studios), and as such not only unappealing, but clearly who have no business featuring in pornography.

This attitude to HIV models is simply prejudice.  A culture which has largely banished or silenced AIDS death now apparently seeking to banish the visibility of HIV+ having sex.  The visual presentation of those HIV+ men having sex is evidence that such men are having sex – in this case, not even penetrative high-risk sex – and thus, perhaps they haven’t quite learnt their lesson.  Perhaps, one diagnosed as HIV+ they should haul their positive arse out of the limelight?

All of which would seem to lend weight to the inclusion of an extra with the film, which features one of the performers – Mark from scene 7 – who apparently talks about his experiences and his status as HIV positive.

The old Ryan Sullivan’s Island film/blog (some NSFW) (what happened to Ryan?) featured a number of guys visiting Morris and talking about being positive, and this ‘extra’ seems to follow in the wake of them – albeit a couple of years later.

Easy to dismiss as just another sequel, the film is on reflection not only a documentation of authentic erotic experiences, but more importantly, the representation of men – including HIV+ men – having sex, being sexual, being aroused, and experiencing pleasure.

4 comments
  1. It sickens me just how discriminating gay men are. We as a population demand equal rights, yet we are some of the most segregating of people. It doesn’t matter whether it’s an issue with race, size, sexual orientation, HIV status, etc. gay men just hate on one another and others just far too much, yet demand equality and, at times, better treatment. I’m sorry, but sometimes I feel that gay teens receive the brunt of bullying for what older members of the gay communities should be receiving.

  2. I’m HIV positive and can tell you the biggest discriminator of poz gay men are other gay men. We are seen as non-human and vile. Sex for us is difficult because of discrimination and the laws that can make anyone who know your status and have consensual sex with turn around later and press charges. I want to see HIV + gay men in porn, we’re sexual beings too not a walking infection .

  3. People are going to live the way they want to live. With the way, jobs, the middle class is not middle class anymore. Health insurance rules the world, and poor bastards are scared, life is risk taking, and knowledge is power, so raw, or condoms, if you fuck; your taking a risk either way, just enjoy the moment.

  4. People are going to live the way they want to live. With the way, jobs, the middle class is not middle class anymore. Health insurance rules the world, and poor bastards are scared, life is risk taking, and knowledge is power, so raw, or condoms, if you fuck; your taking a risk either way, just enjoy the moment.

Comments are closed.

Previous Article

CUMSLOPPY STORY || Superb Customer Service

Next Article

The ALL NEW TIMPersonals - Find Your New Fuck Bud

Related Posts

Want to stay informed?
Sign up for the TIM newsletter!

No, thanks